Posted by: willem van cotthem | May 28, 2007

Get filthy rich by saving African forests (Technorati / Clickafricana)

Highly recommended ! Interesting point !

Read at :

Technorati

http://technorati.com/posts/tag/desertification

Clickafricana

http://clickafricana.com/2007/05/28/get-filthy-rich-by-saving-african-forests/

Get filthy rich by saving African forests

“Renewable Energy is energy derived from resources that are regenerative or for all practical purposes cannot be depleted.[1] For this reason, renewable energy sources are fundamentally different from fossil fuels, and do not produce as many greenhouse gases and other pollutants as fossil fuel combustion. Mankind’s traditional uses of wind, water, and solar energy are widespread in developed and developing countries; but the mass production of electricity using renewable energy sources has become more commonplace recently, reflecting the major threats of climate change due to pollution, exhaustion of fossil fuels, and the environmental, social and political risks of fossil fuels and nuclear power.

Many countries and organizations promote renewable energies through tax incentives and subsidies.” - Renewable energy - Wikipedia

Forget the obvious benefits to the environment for a minute. In the developing world, where firewood often is the main source of energy generation, no one is interested in saving the trees. The unfortunate mindset being: what good is a healthy environment when the people in it are unable to put food on their tables, because they have no money in their pockets?

It needs to be understood that the global economy is a capitalist one. Usually, people think in terms of what’s profitable. And not what’s good for the Rwandan mountain gorilla. Rwanda for one is approaching the concept of renewable energy in terms of economic viability. The small landlocked East African country has little natural resources. Rwanda imports its oil from Kenya and Tanzania. This added expense to the oil makes fuel unaffordable for many rural Rwandans. So what do these people do? The go out into the forest and chop down trees. It’s as simple as that.

We know that wide-scale deforestation is an invitation to desertification, a problem Africa has been faced with for decades. However, this is primarily an environmental issue, so nobody really cares. We all want to fed and warm at night. The question arising from this is, what happens when we run out of trees? What happens when the sinking water table hinders us from accessing safe drinking water? Inaccessibility of safe drinking water is yet another one of Africa’s growing problems today.

Worldwide, energy production is firmly in the grip of the oil industry and its allied sectors. Oil is big business. Western nations wage war over it. So who do we talk to about moving away from oil and switching to renewable energy? The government? To put it in simple terms: government runs the people, corporations run governments. So who do we talk to? How much is the current oil price? It’s usually in somewhere between $50 to $60. With the war in Iraq and the rising conflict in Nigeria’s Niger Delta region, oil is not about to become cheaper anytime soon.

Oil won’t be here forever, either. Much like with the disappearing forests, what do we do when we run out of oil to pump, ship and consume? Oil exploration is hugely capital-intensive, and devastating to the environment. In Rwanda, the use of methane from the depths of Lake Kivu will boost the country’s economy, by supplying their neighbours, who are as much in need of energy as they are. It is a very profitable way of saving the trees.

And this is what we need to keep in mind when addressing the issue of oil vs. renewable energy. Put down the “Save the trees!” banner and pick up the one that says “Get filthy rich by saving African forests! Here’s how….”

The main reason why research into renewable energy technology is still not as much mainstream as it needs to be, is due to this “tree-hugger” reputation that comes with it. This makes it very difficult to get any research funding. We need to avoid talking about how much good solar cars will do to the environment. We should emphasize the profitability of solar cars that run without fuel.

Imagine the following scenario: your city’s public transport system completely adopts the use of solar vehicles. Everything from trains, buses to taxi cabs. Imagine how much money the transport companies will be able to save, when they no longer need to buy and stockpile diesel. Imagine how much cheaper the use of public transport becomes for you and yours.

Leave the oil in the ground and may the sun shine down on you today and tomorrow.

Responses

While I agree 100% that all those publicising renewable energy should wherever possible stress the economic viability, in the past this has not been possible because we had the “chicken and egg” scenario to get past. In many renewable technologies this is still the problem, and in most others they do still need govenrment incentives to get them going economically, even if only due to the higher risk factor in investing in them.

I hope that once the etchnonlogies become established in the west, and become inherently main stream and low risk for the investors, at that time we will be able to translate these technlogies into the poorer countries.

I am a fan of Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Material (fermentation of organic wastes such as farm slurries, crop waste, food waste, green waste from markets, etc).

I hope it is OK to include my link here? It is about Anaerobic Digestion and is all about renewable energy from waste materials here.

I agree with you but it is not the case of day to day domestic deforestation that is actually affecting the large scale dynamics of the Forest areas around the world but through industrial developments like factories / industries that are actually clearing these forests silently – Most Governments have moved forward to sell forests areas ( mostly in US & Africa) based on a short term vision of creating more jobs – development of the industry and get the governments cash out these sales to fund some so called social projects like rural roads etc,. - in other words this is vicious cycle once caught into it these governments cannot & will not come out until disaster strikes in the form of a natural calamity & or political instability – On the whole there is very little choice for the common man to do some thing about all this , On the perspective of a long term vision I would ask these Governments to consider the value of a virgin forest land in 2057 – My guess is that the earth is going to be a lot barren than what it is today.

If money is the major criteria, we as friends of the environment should pool funds to buy up these lands and pledge not to sell it, I know its “BIG TASK” – but its not impossible, if the message is spread in the right direction, Major Corporations around the world could come forward to invest in a forest to compensate their emissions maybe – it could happen in the near future if pushed forward thru envornmental agencies, the concept can be can be converted into an International law on “conserving forests to grow our industries”.

Do we know the value of a “DODO” If at least one British soldier had even thought of saving the creature; we wouldn’t have lost the dodo after all. Of course the presence of the dodo makes little difference to our daily lives but a “VIRGIN RAIN FOREST IN AFRICA” will definitely make a difference to us 100 Years from now.

If we make up our mind today – we could pave a way to make the lives of our grandchildren and future generations a lot easier

Please forward this message to all your friends & relatives and any individual who might show interest in “BUYING A FOREST TO PRESERVE IT “THE WAY IT HAS REMAINED OVER THE PAST 5 MILLION YEARS”

If anyone on the net shares my ideas please get in touch with me at ananth@eliteindia.com

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories